According to a recent report from Child Poverty Action Group CPAG) claimants are being forced to repay their full Universal Credit (UC) award despite being entitled to it.
Why Are The DWP doing this?
During the pandemic the DWP temporarily changed some of the evidence rules to complete UC claims.
As detailed in the report by CPAG in January 2021 the DWP started to look into the claims that were made during the pandemic.
Whilst doing this the DWP have been changing the entitlement decisions given to claimants declaring that many claims have been wrongfully awarded.
Why This Shouldn’t Be Happening
CPAG have expressed their concerns that the process of retrospectively deciding claimants were not entitled to UC and beginning recovery is unlawful.
In addition, the DWP is asking for evidence of entitlement via the online journal, even from claimants that are no longer getting UC and would have no reason to check their journal.
Some claimants only find out about the alleged overpayment when they receive a letter from DWP Debt Management.
They therefore miss the one month deadline for challenging a decision and often don’t know that they could make a late challenge if they have good cause.
Shockingly, this process is set to be ramped up dramatically.
The DWPs Reaction
The DWP are employing a team of 2,000 staff to look again at 2 million claims over the next five years including, but not limited to, claims made during the pandemic.
The thought that a government department that tramples on claimants’ rights in this way is to be given powers of search, seizure and arrest, as revealed in our last newsletter, is truly frightening.
It’s very concerning that the government gives the DWP the authority to stamp on a person’s legal rights in this manner.
Not only are they able to stop a claimants payments without any notice they are also set to be given powers of search, seizure and arrest, as detailed in an earlier blog post.
DWP decisions such as these are life changing and literally leave people without the ability to eat, pay their rent and to keep warm.
Combined with this is the mental toll that this puts upon claimants leaving them in a state of distress not knowing where to get help.
Claimants deserve to be treated with respect and should be given the right to reply before any permanent decisions are made by the DWP.
Not only is it morally wrong to change decisions retrospectively, moving the goalposts when it suits the DWP is despicable and should be challenged at all times.
You can find the full copy of the report here https://cpag.org.uk/policy-and-campaigns/briefing/demands-repay-impact-and-legality-dwp-reverification-uc-claims
Please read, share and tweet this article. Doing so raises awareness of the real issues that affect the working class of this country.
I don’t receive any payment for the work that I do and to say it’s a struggle is an understatement. I’d really like to be able to continue writing and campaigning.
If you are able to and would like to donate there’s a donate button at the top and side of this blog post. Every penny makes a massive difference.
A huge thank you to everyone that reads, shares and supports my blog. I really appreciate it and I couldn’t have got through the last two years without you.
4 thoughts on “DWP Wrongly Forces Universal Credit Claimants To Repay Entire Payments”
Reblogged this on Tory Britain! .
My instinct on this is that the actions detailed form a part of the “hostile environment” (in the benefit system) curated by successive Governments over the last thirty years. This includes the so called “New” Labour administrations. It was a Labour Government that introduced “conditionality” and sanctions to the benefit system.
That’s right John, I remember Sanctions being introduced as part of the New Deal scheme under New Labour, prior to which I had never heard of such a thing as a Benefits Sanction, never heard that word applied to Social Security in the UK, ‘Sanctions’ were something you heard about on the news with regard to being applied against rogue States, uncooperative nations and other countries, not against the British unemployed!
I also remember writing to Labour HQ whilst Ed Miliband was leader, with GE approaching, to ask if they would abolish Benefit Sanctions if elected. I was shocked and disappointed by their reply, which stated (in an email) that they (the Labour Party) fully supported the use of Benefits Sanctions, and that Sanctions were a “vital tool” in helping people back to work. As a result I voted Green and Miliband lost.
You can pretty much guarantee that it will be the same story now under the leadership of Political comedy duo, Reeves & Starmer.
Jeez, what a tangled mess. To think that Universal Credit was allegedly intended to “simplify” the Benefits system, what a joke. Social Security functioned better than this in the 1970s.